I mostly understand what this post is alluding to and mostly agree but what do the astrophysists say about your premise. Would Neil deGrasse Tyson support your views or perhaps Ethan Siegel who a Substack participant as well. Why not ask them?
Not completely clear what branches of physics are included in your thinking. The astrophysists are now looking at events that are over a million light years away which would imply that localized thinking will not be sufficient but it does not automatically imply the AI can fill in the gaps.
Keep pushng the envelop. It keeps me going to try to keep up with you.
Thanks so much Terril! The beautiful thing about Physics is that views don’t need to be supported, there is right and wrong, not much gray area, theories expanding on theories, standing on the shoulders of physicists who paved the way. It’s not necessarily about AI filling the gaps, moreso creating new frameworks and rewriting the entire map.
Like a Klein Bottle?
I had to look that up 😂 gonna have to look into this, thanks!
I mostly understand what this post is alluding to and mostly agree but what do the astrophysists say about your premise. Would Neil deGrasse Tyson support your views or perhaps Ethan Siegel who a Substack participant as well. Why not ask them?
Not completely clear what branches of physics are included in your thinking. The astrophysists are now looking at events that are over a million light years away which would imply that localized thinking will not be sufficient but it does not automatically imply the AI can fill in the gaps.
Keep pushng the envelop. It keeps me going to try to keep up with you.
Thanks so much Terril! The beautiful thing about Physics is that views don’t need to be supported, there is right and wrong, not much gray area, theories expanding on theories, standing on the shoulders of physicists who paved the way. It’s not necessarily about AI filling the gaps, moreso creating new frameworks and rewriting the entire map.