Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chameleon's avatar

I really enjoyed your take on TGNA — it’s rare to see someone seriously exploring heat as a computational medium.

One thing I kept thinking about while reading was memory.

In our current systems, memory is basically electron choreography — moving them, trapping them, or keeping them in a loop. That works brilliantly for speed, but it’s fragile and power-hungry. What’s interesting about heat is its natural persistence. A thermal gradient can linger in a material long after the initial pulse, especially if the geometry and conductivity are tuned for it.

If we treat those lingering temperature profiles as a form of embodied memory, we could get something that behaves less like a digital snapshot and more like a biological memory trace. Imagine a thermal layer that remembers the “shape” of past computations — not just storing bits, but encoding experience in its conductivity map. In a hybrid photonic–thermal system, the photonics could handle fast symbolic work, while the thermal layer slowly integrates and retains context, almost like long-term potentiation in a brain.

That could mean:

• Memory that self-stabilises without refresh cycles.

• Context-sensitive recall, because environment shifts would literally shape the memory state.

• Security benefits — the memory would be inseparable from the exact physical state of the hardware.

And in that sense, you’re absolutely right — the most accurate model of such a system might be the system itself. I think heat could give us a new kind of “living” memory architecture, where storage and computation happen in the same evolving physical substrate.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?